GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文十九

文章作者 100test 发表时间 2007:03:10 10:27:49
来源 100Test.Com百考试题网


79. This newspaper editorial concludes that our city should build a plant for burning
trash in order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills. The
author adds that an incinerator could offer economic benefits as well, since incinerators
can be adapted to generate small amounts of electricity for other uses, and since ash
residue from some kinds of trash can be used as a soil conditioner. Even if these claims
are true, the authors argument is unconvincing in three important respects.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating
trash. It is possible, for example, that respiratory problems resulting from the air
pollution caused by burning trash might be so extensive that they would outweigh the
health risks associated with landfills. If so, the authors conclusion that switching to
incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
Secondly, the author assumes that discontinuing landfill operations would abate
the heath threats they now pose. However, this is not necessarily the case. It is possible
that irreversible environmental damage to subterranean water supplies, for example, has
already occurred. In this event, changing from landfills to incinerators might not avoid
or abate serious public health problems.
Thirdly, the authors implicit claim that incinerators are economically
advantageous to landfills is poorly supported. Only two small economic benefits of
incineration are mentioned, while the costs associated with either burning trash or
switching refuse disposal systems are ignored. In all likelihood, such costs would be
significant, and may very well outweigh the economic benefits.
In conclusion, the authors argument provides inadequate justification for
switching from one disposal system to the other. As it stands, the argument takes into
account only a limited number of benefits from the change, while addressing none of its
costs. To better evaluate the argument, we must first examine all the health risks posed
by each refuse disposal system and conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis of each
system, taking account of the cost of the new system, the cost of the changeover itself,
and the expected costs to the community of health problems resulting from each system.

相关文章


GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文十八
台湾地震海缆受损托福GMAT受影响暂停报名
GMAT考试数学概念和名词汇总(十四)
考生经验:160小时备战考得GMAT750分战果
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文十九
GMAT考试数学概念和名词汇总(十三)
GMAT考试:GMAT每日一读之词汇篇(一)
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文二二
GMAT原因评述题应对技巧
澳大利亚华人论坛
考好网
日本华人论坛
华人移民留学论坛
英国华人论坛